In Thursday's editorial, the author wrote that the anti-abortion display set up by the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform "was, at best, insensitive and tasteless." Is it the display or the result depicted that is insensitive? How does this author have the audacity to call this group insensitive? They are giving a voice to those who can't speak.
The editorial also states the display "turns off anyone who would be willing to ask a question…" I find it interesting that this author assumes to be speaking for everyone. When I was looking at the pictures, I heard college students actually say things like, "That's really what abortion looks like?" Maybe if ignorant pro-choice people learned what abortion really looks like, then America would outlaw this form of murder. If you don't want to see the insensitive results in these pictures, don't look. And as you walk away, ask yourself, "Why do I not want to see the truth of abortion?"
Maybe because to see the truth is to recognize one's conscience, and in today's world, a conscience is a barrier to our own selfish, materialistic endeavors.
