Thank you, Mr. Maple, for bringing Tiger Woods’ affair to light for everyone who had unfortunately missed out on the “media sleaze machine” coverage. I’d have to say that yours was by far worse. Not only did you cite the same news sources you bashed, but you also managed to do so in a way far more offensive than the mainstream media. You refuted the media’s attack on Woods’ affair with a cocktail waitress by saying his actions were only really wrong because he didn’t choose the right type of woman to sleep with.
If you have a hot Swedish wife, maybe you would want more (after all, a man has needs). But you certainly couldn’t get that from some other tool’s sloppy seconds. Once you’re a sports star who has been with a model, you can’t degrade yourself by being with anything less ever again, right? Well, maybe from your patriarchal point of view where women are merely objects to be had. And to think you were attempting to tell us about the crap the major news sources try to push.
